Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755305AbaJCVe7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:34:59 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:58135 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754759AbaJCVez (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:34:55 -0400 Message-ID: <542F167D.2020302@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:34:53 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: frowand.list@gmail.com CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel list , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH to be tested] serial: msm_serial: add missing sysrq handling References: <53E2C573.7090709@gmail.com> <53EAB01B.5030102@codeaurora.org> <53EC1FEA.5070907@gmail.com> <53EC220D.5050908@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53EC220D.5050908@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Frank, On 08/13/14 19:42, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 8/13/2014 7:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 8/12/2014 5:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 08/06/14 17:16, Frank Rowand wrote: > < snip > > >> The patches you sent are a little hard to read since they modify further code >> that my patch modified. So I have redone your patches, as if my patch was >> not previously applied. Hopefully I did not make any mistakes there. I will >> reply to this email with each of your redone patches. > Stephen's patch alternative number 2: I had a discussion with the hardware engineer. Apparently the break bit in the SR register is not "sticky" so it doesn't always stay set when the handle_rx_dm() function runs and a break has entered the fifo. I used your debug patches to confirm this (I never see the break status bit when the fifo has multiple characters in it). It sounds like this bit can't really be used reliably. The recommendation is to use either the break start or break stop interrupt to detect when a break has occurred and then search the fifo for the break character (an all zero character). If there are two such characters then we can't be certain when the break was, but the chances of this seem really slim considering that the stale timeout probably triggers first before a human can type a character after the break. On 1.4 hardware we can change the mode to be single character and then we can reliably detect the break character because only one character enters the fifo and the higher bits of the fifo can be used to detect if it is a break or not. Making that change is probably not that hard, I believe we can reuse all the handle_rx_dm logic and force single character mode on consoles, but 1.3 hardware doesn't benefit from this change. I'll try to get something together soon that tries to make this all work as best as it can. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/