Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:28:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:28:39 -0500 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([210.143.35.51]:28360 "EHLO TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:28:38 -0500 To: "jeff millar" Cc: "Frank van Maarseveen" , Subject: Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? References: <200212041526.57501.shanehelms@eircom.net> <01c301c29bf5$201a9120$6a01a8c0@wa1hco> <20021206005510.A7411@iapetus.localdomain> <007301c29cd3$95ad99d0$6a01a8c0@wa1hco> Reply-To: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop From: Miles Bader Date: 06 Dec 2002 12:36:04 +0900 In-Reply-To: <007301c29cd3$95ad99d0$6a01a8c0@wa1hco> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 733 Lines: 12 "jeff millar" writes: > If a kernel runs 90% efficient now, then there's only 10% additional > improvement possible. If you want to break new ground, then it's > either application space or hardware. YEah, but then the guys taking advantage of the opportunity to break new ground in hardware turn the world on it's head -- and suddenly your highly tuned kernel is is only 1% efficient... -Miles -- Yo mama's so fat when she gets on an elevator it HAS to go down. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/