Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 01:23:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 01:23:44 -0500 Received: from otter.mbay.net ([206.55.237.2]:15114 "EHLO otter.mbay.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 01:23:43 -0500 From: John Alvord To: "Joseph D. Wagner" Cc: "'Alan Cox'" , "'Shane Helms'" , "'Ed Vance'" , "'jeff millar'" , "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" Subject: Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 22:30:53 -0800 Message-ID: <7ug0vuc6cof9fjohs8as79vvjk5m0p4h4i@4ax.com> References: <1039111796.19636.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <001201c29cee$d9680e60$228a3841@joe> In-Reply-To: <001201c29cee$d9680e60$228a3841@joe> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.92/32.570 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 953 Lines: 27 On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 00:15:15 -0600, "Joseph D. Wagner" wrote: >>> I don't know of any mistakes per say, but if I had >>> to do it over again, there's about a thousands things >>> I'd do differently (preference in design choices, not >>> mistakes) especially not to cling so religiously to >>> POSIX compliance. > >> And then you'd have no applications. > >I AM NOT AN IDIOT! DON'T YOU THINK I KNOW THAT? > >It's MY PREFERENCE in operating system design choices. I don't have to make >it compatible with anyone else's. > >Joseph Wagner Indeed... go forth and prosper... but not perhaps on the linux-kernel list where polishing the particular jewel "Linux" is in progress. john alvord - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/