Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 06:52:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 06:52:11 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.65.60]:49496 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 06:52:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:59:43 +0100 From: Hanno =?ISO-8859-15?B?QvZjaw==?= To: "Grover, Andrew" Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, arjanv@redhat.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [ACPI] RE: [BK PATCH] ACPI updates Message-Id: <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1080 Lines: 18 > Well after communicating with Marcelo it sounds like he'd like to hold off > taking it in 2.4.21 because IDE changes take priority, and two big changes > at once is too many for a stable kernel revision. I think this is a very bad news. In my opinion, the ACPI-patch is the most-needed kernel-patch at the moment. For many laptop-users that don't know about this patch, Linux is nearly unuseable. And I already know at least two desktop-pcs that don't have any power-management without the acpi-patch. Andrew, I hope you can find a way to make a patch that the kernel-people will accept as soon as possible. -- Hanno Boeck - hanno@gmx.de /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign Say no to DCMA, TCPA, Palladium! X Against HTML Mail www.stop1984.com / \ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/