Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:22:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:22:10 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:20674 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:22:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:29:32 -0500 From: Arjan van de Ven To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hanno_B=F6ck?= Cc: "Grover, Andrew" , pavel@ucw.cz, arjanv@redhat.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [ACPI] RE: [BK PATCH] ACPI updates Message-ID: <20021206072932.B16173@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno@gmx.de>; from hanno@gmx.de on Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 834 Lines: 18 On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Hanno B?ck wrote: > > Well after communicating with Marcelo it sounds like he'd like to hold off > > taking it in 2.4.21 because IDE changes take priority, and two big changes > > at once is too many for a stable kernel revision. > > I think this is a very bad news. In my opinion, the ACPI-patch > is the most-needed kernel-patch at the moment. For many laptop-users > that don't know about this patch, Linux is nearly > unuseable. the 2.4 patch doesnt' actually offer suspend/resume capabilities; what else did you have in mind as required ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/