Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:41:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:41:45 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:18897 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:41:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:48:58 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@duckman.distro.conectiva To: Norman Gaywood Cc: Pete Zaitcev , "" Subject: Re: Maybe a VM bug in 2.4.18-18 from RH 8.0? In-Reply-To: <20021206122753.A8992@turing.une.edu.au> Message-ID: References: <200212060035.gB60ZnV07386@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20021206122753.A8992@turing.une.edu.au> X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 992 Lines: 28 On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Norman Gaywood wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > Check your /proc/slabinfo, just in case, to rule out a leak. > > Here is a /proc/slabinfo diff of a good system and a very sluggish one: > > inode_cache 305071 305081 512 43583 43583 1 : 124 62 > > buffer_head 3431966 3432150 128 114405 114405 1 : 252 126 Guess what ? 120 MB in inode cache and 450 MB in buffer heads, or 570 MB of zone_normal eaten with just these two items. Looks like the RH kernel needs Stephen Tweedie's patch to reclaim the buffer heads once IO is done ;) regards, Rik -- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/