Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262871AbSLFOPs>; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:15:48 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262859AbSLFOPs>; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:15:48 -0500
Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:18063 "EHLO holomorphy")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262871AbSLFOPr>;
	Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:15:47 -0500
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 06:23:02 -0800
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
       Norman Gaywood <norm@turing.une.edu.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Maybe a VM bug in 2.4.18-18 from RH 8.0?
Message-ID: <20021206142302.GC11023@holomorphy.com>
Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Norman Gaywood <norm@turing.une.edu.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20021206111326.B7232@turing.une.edu.au> <3DEFF69F.481AB823@digeo.com> <20021206011733.GF1567@dualathlon.random> <3DEFFEAA.6B386051@digeo.com> <20021206014429.GI1567@dualathlon.random> <20021206021559.GK9882@holomorphy.com> <1039170975.1432.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1039170975.1432.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1151
Lines: 26

At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> 64GB isn't getting any testing that I know of; I'd hold off until
>> someone's actually stood up and confessed to attempting to boot
>> Linux on such a beast. Or until I get some more RAM. =)

On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:36:15AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> United Linux at least has tested this according to
> http://www.unitedlinux.com/en/press/pr111902.html
> Hardware functionality is exploited through advanced features such as
> large memory support for up to 64 GB of RAM
> so I'm sure Andrea's VM deals with it gracefully

I'm not convinced of grace even if I were to take it from this that it
were directly tested, which seems doubtful given the nature of the page.
This page sounds more like CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is an option.

And besides, the report is useless unless it's got actual technical
content and descriptions reported by an kernel hacker.


Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/