Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:54:03 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 5/6] AHCI: Optimize single IRQ interrupt
 processing
Message-ID: <20141006145403.GB18303@htj.dyndns.org>
References: <20140924104213.GA2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com>
 <20140924130444.GA16555@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20140924140844.GB2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com>
 <20140924143913.GH16555@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20141001153114.GE8971@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com>
 <20141005022311.GD8549@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20141005161646.GB22223@mtj.dyndns.org>
 <20141006072710.GH8971@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com>
 <20141006125817.GA18303@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20141006132445.GA18339@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141006132445.GA18339@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:24:46PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:58:17AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I don't think we'd be able to move libata handling to block softirq
> > and probably end up just doing it from the irq context.  Anyways, as
> > long as you're gonna keep working on it, I have no objection to the
> > proposed changes.  Do you have a refreshed version or is the current
> > version good for inclusion?
> 
> No, this one would not apply. I can send updated version on top of
> v5 I posted earlier. Should I?

Yeap, please do so.

Thanks a lot for your patience!  :)

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/