Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:02:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:02:43 -0500 Received: from h-64-105-35-8.SNVACAID.covad.net ([64.105.35.8]:38627 "EHLO freya.yggdrasil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:02:42 -0500 From: "Adam J. Richter" Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:07:16 -0800 Message-Id: <200212061707.JAA22194@baldur.yggdrasil.com> To: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com Subject: Re: [RFC] generic device DMA implementation Cc: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, miles@gnu.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2312 Lines: 41 On Fri, 06 Dec 2002, James Bottomley wrote: >adam@yggdrasil.com said: >> I like your term DMA_CONSISTENT better than DMA_CONFORMANCE_CONSISTANT >> . I think the word "conformance" in there does not reduce the time >> that it takes to figure out what the symbol means. I don't think any >> other facility will want to use the terms DMA_{,IN}CONSISTENT, so I >> prefer that we go with the more medium sized symbol. >I'm not so keen on this. The idea of this parameter is not to tell the >allocation routine what type of memory you would like, but to tell it what >type of memory the driver can cope with. I think for the inconsistent case, >DMA_INCONSISTENT looks like the driver is requiring inconsistent memory, and >expecting to get it. I'm open to changing the "CONFORMANCE" part, but I'd >like to name these parameters something that doesn't imply they're requesting >a type of memory. How about renaming DMA_INCONSISTENT to DMA_MAYBE_CONSISTENT? By the way, I previously suggested a flags field to indicate what the driver could cope with. 0 would mean consistent memory, 1's would indicate other things that the driver could cope with that would be added if and when a real need for them arises (read caching, write back cachine, cpu-cpu consistency, cache line size smaller than 2**n bytes, etc.). Regarding the debugging capability of DMA_CONFORMANCE_NONE, I don't think that will be as useful in the way that DMA_DIRECTION_NONE is, because transfer direction is often passed through the io path of a device driver and errors in doing so are a common. In comparison, I think the calls to dma_malloc will typically have this argument specified as a constant where the call is made, with the possible exception of some allocation being consolidated in the generic device layer. Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Milpitas, California 95035 +1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America "Free Software For The Rest Of Us." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/