Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754829AbaJGRM6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:12:58 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:52721 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752858AbaJGRM4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:12:56 -0400 X-Google-Original-Sender: Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:10:03 +0200 From: Johan Hovold To: Octavian Purdila Cc: Johan Hovold , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Wolfram Sang , Samuel Ortiz , Lee Jones , Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Baluta , Laurentiu Palcu , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, lkml , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mfd: add support for Diolan DLN-2 devices Message-ID: <20141007171003.GI5362@localhost> References: <1411661254-5204-1-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> <1411661254-5204-2-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> <20141003171207.GC2394@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:17:22PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 07:07:31PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote: > > > This patch implements the USB part of the Diolan USB-I2C/SPI/GPIO > > > Master Adapter DLN-2. Details about the device can be found here: > > > > > > > > > + > > > + ret = dln2_submit_urb(dln2, dln2->rx_urb[i], GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (ret < 0) > > > + return ret; > > > > Is it really worth having this helper only to save a couple of lines on > > a dev_err? If you do all resubmissions on completion inline in the > > handler, you only have three places where usb_submit_urb is called. > > > > I moved the completion in the handler as you suggested. I have kept > the helper, would you prefer to remove it? Moved the "completion"? I was suggesting that the URB resubmission should be done inline the URB completion handler. [ "Completion" may be a little ambiguous. The URB callback is called an URB completion handler. Not be confused with the completion structures you use to wait for responses. ] It's fine to keep the helper as long as it's clear that the urb has been "cached" and should not be resubmitted (inline) in the completion handler in that case. > > > > > + id = dln2->usb_dev->bus->busnum << 8 | dln2->usb_dev->devnum; > > > > After giving this some more thought, I think you should just > > use PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO as id. I have submitted a series to fix the > > other USB MFD drivers and add a convenience helper to register > > hotpluggable MFDs here: > > > > OK, I will use PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO for now. If your series merges > first and I have to resubmit mine, I will switch to using > mfd_add_hotplug_devices. Lee merged the helper function earlier today. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/