From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
        Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
References: <1412683977-29543-1-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org>
	<20141007133039.GG7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<20141007133339.GH7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<87r3yjy64e.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
	<20141007204627.GI28519@ubuntumail>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:52:35 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20141007204627.GI28519@ubuntumail> (Serge Hallyn's message of
	"Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:46:27 +0000")
Message-ID: <87wq8bvbzg.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] mnt: add ability to clone mntns starting with the current root
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com> writes:

> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com):
>> Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> writes:
>> 
>> 2> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:30:40PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:12:57PM +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>> >> > Another problem is that rootfs can't be hidden from a container, because
>> >> > rootfs can't be moved or umounted.
>> >> 
>> >> ... which is a bug in mntns_install(), AFAICS.
>> >
>> > Ability to get to exposed rootfs, that is.
>> 
>> The container side of this argument is pretty bogus.  It only applies
>> if user namespaces are not used for the container.
>
> User namespaces are still far too restricted for many container use
> cases.  We can't say "we have user namespaces so now privileged
> containers can be ignored".  Yes you never should have handed the
> keys to a privileged container to an untrusted person, but we do
> still try to protect the host from accidental damage due to a
> privileged container.

What I meant is that it isn't about containers.   It is about something
root can do.  So this is not a "container" problem.

>> So it is only root (and not root in a container) who can get to the
>> exposed rootfs.
>> 
>> I have a vague memory someone actually had a real use in miminal systems
>> for being able to get back to the rootfs and being able to use rootfs as
>> the rootfs.  There was even a patch at that time that Andrew Morton was
>> carrying for a time to allow unmounting root and get at rootfs, and to
>> prevent the oops on rootfs unmount in some way.
>> 
>> So not only do I not think it is a bug to get back too rootfs, I think
>> it is a feature that some people have expressed at least half-way sane
>> uses for.
>
> They can still do that if they want, using chroot :)

It would take fchdir or fchroot and a directory file descriptor open on
rootfs.  Frequently there is no appropriate directory file descriptor.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/