Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754129AbaJHDAm (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:00:42 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:45165 "EHLO mail-qc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754051AbaJHDAk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:00:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1410786785-9838-1-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com> <1410786785-9838-3-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:30:39 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iqoyzGwGxNRQ8SpXa3F7sYZXt9s Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/exynos: dp: Remove support for unused dptx-phy From: Vivek Gautam To: inki.dae@samsung.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Cc: Sean Paul , kishon , ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com, Vivek Gautam , Jingoo Han , Kukjin Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, CC'ing Kukjin, my bad, missed him while sending the patch. :-( On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings, >> we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy. >> Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the >> same. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam >> Cc: Jingoo Han >> --- > > Is someone taking care of this patch ? We already have got the corresponsding > dp-phy patch merged, so we should also get this patch in. > >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 58 +++++++------------------------ >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h | 2 -- >> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> index 4f3c7eb..5ffc1b2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> @@ -1050,28 +1050,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct exynos_drm_display *display, >> >> static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - if (dp->phy) { >> + if (dp->phy) >> phy_power_on(dp->phy); >> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { >> - u32 reg; >> - >> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); >> - reg |= dp->enable_mask; >> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); >> - } >> } >> >> static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - if (dp->phy) { >> + if (dp->phy) >> phy_power_off(dp->phy); >> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { >> - u32 reg; >> - >> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); >> - reg &= ~(dp->enable_mask); >> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); >> - } >> } >> >> static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) >> @@ -1210,39 +1196,21 @@ static struct video_info *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev) >> >> static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node); >> - u32 phy_base; >> int ret = 0; >> >> - dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy"); >> - if (!dp_phy_node) { >> - dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); >> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dp->phy); >> - } >> - >> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg", &phy_base)) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n"); >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto err; >> - } >> - >> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask", >> - &dp->enable_mask)) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n"); >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto err; >> - } >> - >> - dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4); >> - if (!dp->phy_addr) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n"); >> - ret = -ENOMEM; >> - goto err; >> + dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); >> + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) { >> + ret = PTR_ERR(dp->phy); >> + if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV) { >> + dp->phy = NULL; >> + } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { >> + return ret; >> + } else { >> + dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> } >> >> -err: >> - of_node_put(dp_phy_node); >> - >> return ret; >> } >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h >> index a1aee69..6426201 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h >> @@ -153,8 +153,6 @@ struct exynos_dp_device { >> struct clk *clock; >> unsigned int irq; >> void __iomem *reg_base; >> - void __iomem *phy_addr; >> - unsigned int enable_mask; >> >> struct video_info *video_info; >> struct link_train link_train; >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 >> > > > > -- > Best Regards > Vivek Gautam > Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore > India -- Best Regards Vivek Gautam Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore India -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/