Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:44:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:44:06 -0500 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:21516 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:44:05 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 00:51:38 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Grover, Andrew" Cc: acpi-devel@sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Proposed ACPI Licensing change Message-ID: <20021207005138.A22295@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "Grover, Andrew" , acpi-devel@sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from andrew.grover@intel.com on Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:10:00PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 17 On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:10:00PM -0800, Grover, Andrew wrote: > In order to solve this, we are considering releasing the Linux version of > the interpreter under a dual license. This would allow direct incorporation > of changes. Any patches submitted against the ACPI core code would > implicitly be allowed to be used by us in a non-GPL context. This is already > done elsewhere in the Linux kernel source by the PCMCIA code, for example. > > Comments? I think that's fine. Please use a known license for the second option, i.e. MPL. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/