Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755113AbaJHUyw (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:54:52 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:35642 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753439AbaJHUyu (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:54:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:54:41 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Lan Tianyu Cc: mingo@kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, toshi.kani@hp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ktkhai@parallels.com, fabf@skynet.be, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa@mit.edu, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com, tipbot@zytor.com, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 0/3] PM/CPU: Parallel enalbing nonboot cpus with resume devices Message-ID: <20141008205441.GJ4750@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1411633925-9018-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1411633925-9018-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:32:02PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: > This patchset is to parallel enabling nonboot cpus with resuming devices > during system resume in order to accelerate S2RAM. From test result on > a 8 logical core Haswell machine, system resume time reduces from 347ms > to 217ms with this patchset. > > In the current world, all nonboot cpus are enabled serially during system > resume. System resume sequence is that boot cpu enables nonboot cpu one by > one and then resume devices. Before resuming devices, there are few tasks > assigned to nonboot cpus after they are brought up. This wastes cpu usage. > > This patchset is to allow boot cpu to go forward to resume devices after > bringing up one nonboot cpu and starting a thread. The thread will be in > charge of bringing up other frozen cpus. The thread will be scheduled to > the first online cpu to run . This makes enabling cpu2~x parallel with > resuming devices. So I feel we should really clean up hotplug before doing anything like this. Its a trainwreck and just piling more and more hacks ontop isn't going to help any. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/