Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754088AbaJHXSx (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:18:53 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:55092 "EHLO mail-lb0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751829AbaJHXSw (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:18:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20141008154659.31f46436@as> <5435A4A4.1070101@zytor.com> <20141008160956.7584d303@as> <5435AABC.2010902@zytor.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:18:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vdso_standalone_test_x86.c build failure on Linus' tree To: Peter Foley Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Chuck Ebbert , Josh Boyer , Randy Dunlap , Jiri Kosina , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , Linus Torvalds Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> That we can't solve, but it is not okay to break the kernel build. > > Should I just make CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC depend on CROSS_COMPILE=""? > I'm not sure how much value would be added by implementing targetprogs > in kbuild, simply to increase build testing of Documentation/ Yes, IMO. Let the kselftest people solve it, because they might have extra requirements. --Andy -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/