Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264004AbSLGRjT>; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:39:19 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264610AbSLGRjT>; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:39:19 -0500
Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:63237 "HELO
	kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S264004AbSLGRjT>;
	Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:39:19 -0500
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 09:46:23 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
Cc: acpi-devel@sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proposed ACPI Licensing change
Message-ID: <20021207174623.GB16179@kroah.com>
References: <EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD04C7A57F@orsmsx119.jf.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD04C7A57F@orsmsx119.jf.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 759
Lines: 17

On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:10:00PM -0800, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> In order to solve this, we are considering releasing the Linux version of
> the interpreter under a dual license. This would allow direct incorporation
> of changes. Any patches submitted against the ACPI core code would
> implicitly be allowed to be used by us in a non-GPL context. This is already
> done elsewhere in the Linux kernel source by the PCMCIA code, for example.

Fine with me too.  What would the other license be?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/