Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757596AbaJIQiO (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:38:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:51039 "EHLO mail-wg0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757198AbaJIQfi (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:35:38 -0400 From: Stephane Eranian To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, ak@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, kan.liang@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, maria.n.dimakopoulou@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] perf/x86: add index param to get_event_constraint() callback Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:34:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1412872486-2930-5-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1412872486-2930-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> References: <1412872486-2930-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch adds an index parameter to the get_event_constraint() x86_pmu callback. It is expected to represent the index of the event in the cpuc->event_list[] array. When the callback is used for fake_cpuc (evnet validation), then the index must be -1. The motivation for passing the index is to use it to index into another cpuc array. Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 4 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 4 +++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c | 6 ++++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c index ca44ba2..56b97a4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int *assign) for (i = 0, wmin = X86_PMC_IDX_MAX, wmax = 0; i < n; i++) { hwc = &cpuc->event_list[i]->hw; - c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(cpuc, cpuc->event_list[i]); + c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(cpuc, i, cpuc->event_list[i]); hwc->constraint = c; wmin = min(wmin, c->weight); @@ -1731,7 +1731,7 @@ static int validate_event(struct perf_event *event) if (IS_ERR(fake_cpuc)) return PTR_ERR(fake_cpuc); - c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, event); + c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, -1, event); if (!c || !c->weight) ret = -EINVAL; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h index b6848c3..667a185 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h @@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ struct x86_pmu { u64 max_period; struct event_constraint * (*get_event_constraints)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, + int idx, struct perf_event *event); void (*put_event_constraints)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, @@ -690,7 +691,8 @@ static inline int amd_pmu_init(void) int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event); struct event_constraint * -x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event); +x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx, + struct perf_event *event); struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c index a8d1a43..65b9a4b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c @@ -430,7 +430,8 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu) } static struct event_constraint * -amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) +amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx, + struct perf_event *event) { /* * if not NB event or no NB, then no constraints @@ -538,7 +539,8 @@ static struct event_constraint amd_f15_PMC50 = EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0x3F, 0); static struct event_constraint amd_f15_PMC53 = EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0x38, 0); static struct event_constraint * -amd_get_event_constraints_f15h(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) +amd_get_event_constraints_f15h(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx, + struct perf_event *event) { struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; unsigned int event_code = amd_get_event_code(hwc); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c index 4b6a3b0..64bbb57 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c @@ -1753,7 +1753,8 @@ intel_shared_regs_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, } struct event_constraint * -x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) +x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx, + struct perf_event *event) { struct event_constraint *c; @@ -1770,7 +1771,8 @@ x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) } static struct event_constraint * -intel_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) +intel_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx, + struct perf_event *event) { struct event_constraint *c; @@ -1786,7 +1788,7 @@ intel_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event if (c) return c; - return x86_get_event_constraints(cpuc, event); + return x86_get_event_constraints(cpuc, idx, event); } static void @@ -2020,9 +2022,12 @@ static struct event_constraint counter2_constraint = EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0x4, 0); static struct event_constraint * -hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) +hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx, + struct perf_event *event) { - struct event_constraint *c = intel_get_event_constraints(cpuc, event); + struct event_constraint *c; + + c = intel_get_event_constraints(cpuc, idx, event); /* Handle special quirk on in_tx_checkpointed only in counter 2 */ if (event->hw.config & HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED) { -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/