Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752106AbaJITN7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:13:59 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34753 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751229AbaJITNw (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:13:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:13:51 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Peter Hurley Cc: "xinhui.pan" , Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Zhang, Yanmin" , mnipxh , gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty/n_gsm.c: do not clear gsm_mux entry when the gsm is not closed Message-ID: <20141009191351.GA4256@kroah.com> References: <53D0CF0D.9060103@intel.com> <20140727180953.GA7232@kroah.com> <53D5F8C9.4070008@intel.com> <20140728151324.GA12973@kroah.com> <5436DB9A.6040801@hurleysoftware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5436DB9A.6040801@hurleysoftware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:01:46PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 07/28/2014 11:13 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:16:25PM +0800, xinhui.pan wrote: > >>> Why can't you do dynamic reference counting of your structure, that > >>> would allow you to get rid of your global array, right? > >>> > >> > >> Thanks for your nice comments. > >> Struct gsm has a ref-count already. :) > > > > Then you should be fine, no need to keep it in an array. > > > >> And also adding a ref-count is a little hard to me. :( > >> This global array is used to keep tracking the gsms that stands for the gsmttyXX. > > > > You shouldn't need that at all, just use a list, you don't care what the > > XX number is within the driver, just allocate a new one with the next > > available number and you should be fine. > > > >> and it can tell us if we can create a new gsm. :) > > > > You should always be able to create a new gsm if you need to :) > > > >> In gsm_init we set *gsm_tty_driver = alloc_tty_driver(256);* > > > > Why limit to 256? Just use a list, and a idr structure to allocate the > > minor number, and all should be good. > > Hi Greg, > > This is still broken in the gsm driver. > > As much as I'd like to see someone take ownership of the gsm driver and > do this 'the right way', I think until that happens we should consider > fixing the reuse-while-in-use error. What happened to the gsm driver maintainers? > Would you be willing to take a patch from me that just does the bare > minimum to keep this from panicking in the cdev code? Depends on what the patch looks like :) Send it on, and I'll be glad to review it. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/