Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751375AbaJIT6h (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:58:37 -0400 Received: from webbox4.loswebos.de ([213.187.93.205]:54567 "EHLO webbox4.loswebos.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751045AbaJIT6f (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:58:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20141009190406.GA5428@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: acpitool - /proc/acpi/wakeup From: Marc Burkhardt Reply-to: marc@osknowledge.org Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:58:30 +0000 To: Frans Klaver CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <5DD50C84-608E-4A73-B65D-F6369DF7E1D0@osknowledge.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Marc Burkhardt >wrote: >> I upgraded from 3.10 on that machine. 3.12 didn't work for me due to >a hibernation bug. The rest was left out... :/ > >If you still have the 3.12 kernel around, could you test if acpitool >-e worked there? Let me ask you a question: does it make sense to test 3.12 again because you know there's something changed regarding /proc/acpi/... or because it's the kernel I broke up on upgrading? I could compile one, sure. But I have no time to actually 'bisect' this... unfortunately. Thanks for your support, Marc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/