Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751454AbaJIUQP (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 16:16:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:52430 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751024AbaJIUQN (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 16:16:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5DD50C84-608E-4A73-B65D-F6369DF7E1D0@osknowledge.org> References: <20141009190406.GA5428@localhost> <5DD50C84-608E-4A73-B65D-F6369DF7E1D0@osknowledge.org> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:16:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: acpitool - /proc/acpi/wakeup From: Frans Klaver To: Marc Burkhardt Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Marc Burkhardt wrote: > > >>On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Marc Burkhardt >>wrote: >>> I upgraded from 3.10 on that machine. 3.12 didn't work for me due to >>a hibernation bug. The rest was left out... :/ >> >>If you still have the 3.12 kernel around, could you test if acpitool >>-e worked there? > > Let me ask you a question: does it make sense to test 3.12 again because you know there's something changed regarding /proc/acpi/... or because it's the kernel I broke up on upgrading? Never mind. It broke after 3.14. I'll bisect. Frans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/