Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:34:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:34:28 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:57823 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:34:27 -0500 Message-ID: <3DF28748.186AB31F@digeo.com> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 15:42:00 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.46 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] net drivers and cache alignment References: <3DF2844C.F9216283@digeo.com> <20021207.153045.26640406.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2002 23:42:00.0630 (UTC) FILETIME=[3CE67560:01C29E4A] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 873 Lines: 23 "David S. Miller" wrote: > > From: Andrew Morton > Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 15:29:16 -0800 > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Attached is cut #2. Thanks for all the near-instant feedback so far :) > > Andrew, does the attached still need padding on SMP? > > It needs padding _only_ on SMP. ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp. > > non-smp machines lack L2 caches? That's new to me :-) > > More seriously, there are real benefits on non-SMP systems. Then I am most confused. None of these fields will be put under busmastering or anything like that, so what advantage is there in spreading them out? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/