Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752189AbaJJITh (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 04:19:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:47704 "EHLO mail-qc0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751796AbaJJITU (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 04:19:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1412889395-19350-1-git-send-email-fabf@skynet.be> References: <1412889395-19350-1-git-send-email-fabf@skynet.be> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:19:18 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] ceph: fix bool assignments From: Ilya Dryomov To: Fabian Frederick Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sage Weil , Ceph Development , "Yan, Zheng" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Fabian Frederick wrote: > Fix some coccinelle warnings: > fs/ceph/caps.c:2400:6-10: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2401:6-15: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2402:6-17: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2403:6-22: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2404:6-22: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2405:6-19: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2440:4-20: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2469:3-16: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2490:2-18: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2519:3-7: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2549:3-12: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2575:2-6: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > fs/ceph/caps.c:2589:3-7: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1 > > Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick > --- > fs/ceph/caps.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ceph/caps.c b/fs/ceph/caps.c > index 6d1cd45..7131327 100644 > --- a/fs/ceph/caps.c > +++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c > @@ -2397,12 +2397,12 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, > u64 max_size = le64_to_cpu(grant->max_size); > struct timespec mtime, atime, ctime; > int check_caps = 0; > - bool wake = 0; > - bool writeback = 0; > - bool queue_trunc = 0; > - bool queue_invalidate = 0; > - bool queue_revalidate = 0; > - bool deleted_inode = 0; > + bool wake = false; > + bool writeback = false; > + bool queue_trunc = false; > + bool queue_invalidate = false; > + bool queue_revalidate = false; > + bool deleted_inode = false; > > dout("handle_cap_grant inode %p cap %p mds%d seq %d %s\n", > inode, cap, mds, seq, ceph_cap_string(newcaps)); > @@ -2437,7 +2437,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, > /* there were locked pages.. invalidate later > in a separate thread. */ > if (ci->i_rdcache_revoking != ci->i_rdcache_gen) { > - queue_invalidate = 1; > + queue_invalidate = true; > ci->i_rdcache_revoking = ci->i_rdcache_gen; > } > } > @@ -2466,7 +2466,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, > set_nlink(inode, le32_to_cpu(grant->nlink)); > if (inode->i_nlink == 0 && > (newcaps & (CEPH_CAP_LINK_SHARED | CEPH_CAP_LINK_EXCL))) > - deleted_inode = 1; > + deleted_inode = true; > } > > if ((issued & CEPH_CAP_XATTR_EXCL) == 0 && grant->xattr_len) { > @@ -2487,7 +2487,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, > /* Do we need to revalidate our fscache cookie. Don't bother on the > * first cache cap as we already validate at cookie creation time. */ > if ((issued & CEPH_CAP_FILE_CACHE) && ci->i_rdcache_gen > 1) > - queue_revalidate = 1; > + queue_revalidate = true; > > if (newcaps & CEPH_CAP_ANY_RD) { > /* ctime/mtime/atime? */ > @@ -2516,7 +2516,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, > ci->i_wanted_max_size = 0; /* reset */ > ci->i_requested_max_size = 0; > } > - wake = 1; > + wake = true; > } > } > > @@ -2546,7 +2546,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, > ceph_cap_string(newcaps), > ceph_cap_string(revoking)); > if (revoking & used & CEPH_CAP_FILE_BUFFER) > - writeback = 1; /* initiate writeback; will delay ack */ > + writeback = true; /* initiate writeback; will delay ack */ > else if (revoking == CEPH_CAP_FILE_CACHE && > (newcaps & CEPH_CAP_FILE_LAZYIO) == 0 && > queue_invalidate) > @@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, > cap->implemented |= newcaps; /* add bits only, to > * avoid stepping on a > * pending revocation */ > - wake = 1; > + wake = true; > } > BUG_ON(cap->issued & ~cap->implemented); > > @@ -2586,7 +2586,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc, > kick_flushing_inode_caps(mdsc, session, inode); > up_read(&mdsc->snap_rwsem); > if (newcaps & ~issued) > - wake = 1; > + wake = true; > } > > if (queue_trunc) { (CC'ing Yan just in case) Applied. Thanks, Ilya -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/