Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 19:12:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 19:12:27 -0500 Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.20]:11996 "EHLO mailout08.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 19:12:26 -0500 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Four function buttons on DELL Latitude X200 In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.14-20020917 ("Chop Suey!") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.18-xfs (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 01:19:52 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 765 Lines: 19 In article you wrote: > this patch add support for four functions key on DELL Latitude X200. we need a more generic appoach to handle those key codes for various extensions. I think a pure software reconfiguration of the keymaps or a daemon trakcing the raw codes is fine. Perhaps we can make something like a hook into the kernel where all untrapped function keys are send to in raw format? Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/