Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:03:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:03:22 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:32526 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:03:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:11:39 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alan Cox cc: Richard Henderson , Patrick Mochel , Willy Tarreau , Petr Vandrovec , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Subject: Re: /proc/pci deprecation? In-Reply-To: <1039458577.10470.49.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 891 Lines: 23 On 9 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Tested and verified. If I leave it alone non apic mode works. To use > APIC mode I have to write the new IRQ value into that register. I've > shoved that into the driver for now, since its a demented chip specific > horror. That's definitely where it should be - the behaviour of the PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE register is clearly chip-specific, so it should be in the chip-specific drivers.. It's a kind of strange behaviour, though. What chip is this? It sounds kind of convenient, but as far as I can tell it can only work for those kinds of PCI devices that are on the same chip as the irq controller.. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/