Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S265844AbSLIRev>; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:34:51 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S265865AbSLIRev>; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:34:51 -0500
Received: from poup.poupinou.org ([195.101.94.96]:287 "EHLO poup.poupinou.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S265844AbSLIReu>;
	Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:34:50 -0500
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:42:32 +0100
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Ducrot Bruno <poup@poupinou.org>,
       kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [2.5.50, ACPI] link error
Message-ID: <20021209174232.GC14882@poup.poupinou.org>
References: <20021205224019.GH7396@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0212051632120.974-100000@localhost.localdomain> <20021206000618.GB15784@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20021206185702.GE17595@poup.poupinou.org> <20021208194944.GB19604@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20021209102858.GA14882@poup.poupinou.org> <20021209110111.GA18878@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021209110111.GA18878@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Ducrot Bruno <poup@poupinou.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1531
Lines: 40

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:01:11PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > I think that s4bios is nice to have. Its similar to S3 and easier to
> > > set up than swsusp... It would be nice to have it.
> > 
> > for me:
> > pros:
> > -----
> > 1- it is really really more easier to implement than S4;
> > 2- we can even have it with 2.4 kernels (it seems that it work without
> > the need of freezing processes, but I suspect that this statement
> > is 'wrong' by nature).
> > 
> > cons:
> > -----
> > 1- it is much slower (especially at save time) than your swsusp;
> > 2- end users must setup their systems (need to create a suspend partition,
> > or to keep a vfat partition as the really first one (/dev/hda1));
> > 3- we use a bios function.  Actually, everything can happen...
> > 
> > That why I prefer swsusp at this time, or any other implementation of S4 (I
> > think about an implementation of S4 via LKCD).
> 
> Yes I think swsusp is better (long term), but it might be worth it to
> have S4bios, too. At least it has nice graphical task bars :-). Can
> you push the patch, or is it okay for me to try to get it merged?
> 

Ok, ok.  I will try to push the patch.

-- 
Ducrot Bruno
http://www.poupinou.org        Page profaissionelle
http://toto.tu-me-saoules.com  Haume page
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/