Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755166AbaJNJhA (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:37:00 -0400 Received: from ns.mm-sol.com ([37.157.136.199]:52841 "EHLO extserv.mm-sol.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754179AbaJNJg5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:36:57 -0400 Message-ID: <543CEEB0.10601@mm-sol.com> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 12:36:48 +0300 From: Stanimir Varbanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hartmut Knaack CC: Ian Campbell , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , Mark Rutland , Grant Likely , Jonathan Cameron , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Lars-Peter Clausen , Angelo Compagnucci , Doug Anderson , Fugang Duan , Johannes Thumshirn , Jean Delvare , Philippe Reynes , Lee Jones , Josh Cartwright , Stephen Boyd , David Collins , "Ivan T. Ivanov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: vadc: Qualcomm SPMI PMIC voltage ADC driver References: <1411563415-11933-1-git-send-email-svarbanov@mm-sol.com> <1411563415-11933-2-git-send-email-svarbanov@mm-sol.com> <543AFBBC.50400@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <543AFBBC.50400@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/13/2014 01:07 AM, Hartmut Knaack wrote: > Stanimir Varbanov schrieb am 24.09.2014 14:56: >> The voltage ADC is peripheral of Qualcomm SPMI PMIC chips. It has >> 15bits resolution and register space inside PMIC accessible across >> SPMI bus. >> >> The vadc driver registers itself through IIO interface. > Quite a lot of changes. Please see my comments inline. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov >> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov >> --- >> drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig | 10 + >> drivers/iio/adc/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-vadc.c | 1029 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-pmic-vadc.h | 119 +++ >> 4 files changed, 1159 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-vadc.c >> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-pmic-vadc.h >> >> + >> +static int vadc_reset(struct vadc_priv *vadc) >> +{ >> + u8 data; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = vadc_write(vadc, VADC_ACCESS, VADC_ACCESS_DATA); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = vadc_read(vadc, VADC_PERH_RESET_CTL3, &data); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = vadc_write(vadc, VADC_ACCESS, VADC_ACCESS_DATA); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + data |= VADC_FOLLOW_WARM_RB; >> + >> + return vadc_write(vadc, VADC_PERH_RESET_CTL3, data); >> +} >> + >> +static int vadc_enable(struct vadc_priv *vadc, bool state) >> +{ >> + return vadc_write(vadc, VADC_EN_CTL1, state ? VADC_EN_CTL1_SET : 0); >> +} >> + >> +#ifdef DEBUG >> +static void vadc_show_status(struct vadc_priv *vadc) >> +{ > You could also move the #ifdef in here... >> + u8 mode, sta1, chan, dig, en, req; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = vadc_read(vadc, VADC_MODE_CTL, &mode); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = vadc_read(vadc, VADC_ADC_DIG_PARAM, &dig); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = vadc_read(vadc, VADC_ADC_CH_SEL_CTL, &chan); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = vadc_read(vadc, VADC_CONV_REQ, &req); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = vadc_read(vadc, VADC_STATUS1, &sta1); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = vadc_read(vadc, VADC_EN_CTL1, &en); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + dev_dbg(vadc->dev, >> + "mode:%02x en:%02x chan:%02x dig:%02x req:%02x sta1:%02x\n", >> + mode, en, chan, dig, req, sta1); > ...and the #endif here. Saves 2 lines of code ;-) I don't like #ifdefs in function body, it makes code unreadable at least for me :) >> +} >> +#else >> +static void vadc_show_status(struct vadc_priv *vadc) {} >> +#endif >> + >> + >> +static int vadc_get_dt_channel_data(struct device *dev, >> + struct vadc_channel_prop *prop, >> + struct device_node *node) >> +{ >> + const char *name = node->name; >> + u32 chan, value, varr[2]; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &chan); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "invalid channel number %s\n", name); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + if (chan > VADC_CHAN_MAX || chan < VADC_CHAN_MIN) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s invalid channel number %d\n", name, chan); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* the channel has DT description */ >> + prop->channel = chan; >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,decimation", &value); >> + if (!ret) { >> + ret = vadc_decimation_from_dt(value); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "%02x invalid decimation %d\n", >> + chan, value); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + prop->decimation = ret; >> + } else { >> + prop->decimation = VADC_DEF_DECIMATION; >> + } >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, "qcom,pre-scaling", varr, 2); >> + if (!ret) { >> + ret = vadc_prescaling_from_dt(varr[0], varr[1]); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "%02x invalid pre-scaling <%d %d>\n", >> + chan, varr[0], varr[1]); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + prop->prescale = ret; >> + } else { >> + prop->prescale = vadc_chans[prop->channel].prescale_index; >> + } >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,hw-settle-time", &value); >> + if (!ret) { >> + ret = vadc_hw_settle_time_from_dt(value); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "%02x invalid hw-settle-time %d, us\n", > The colon inside the string is probably an unintended leftover? correct. >> + chan, value); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + prop->hw_settle_time = ret; >> + } else { >> + prop->hw_settle_time = VADC_DEF_HW_SETTLE_TIME; >> + } >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,avg-samples", &value); >> + if (!ret) { >> + ret = vadc_avg_samples_from_dt(value); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "%02x invalid avg-samples %d\n", >> + chan, value); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + prop->avg_samples = ret; >> + } else { >> + prop->avg_samples = VADC_DEF_AVG_SAMPLES; >> + } >> + >> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "qcom,ratiometric")) >> + prop->calibration = VADC_CALIB_RATIOMETRIC; >> + else >> + prop->calibration = VADC_CALIB_ABSOLUTE; >> + >> + dev_dbg(dev, "%02x name %s\n", chan, name); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int vadc_get_dt_data(struct vadc_priv *vadc, struct device_node *node) >> +{ >> + struct iio_chan_spec *iio_chan = vadc->iio_chans; >> + const struct vadc_channels *vadc_chan; >> + struct vadc_channel_prop prop; >> + struct device_node *child; >> + int ret, index = 0; > index could be defined unsigned, as it should only carry unsigned values. makes sense. >> + >> + for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child) { >> + ret = vadc_get_dt_channel_data(vadc->dev, &prop, child); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + vadc->chan_props[index] = prop; >> + >> + vadc_chan = &vadc_chans[prop.channel]; >> + >> + iio_chan->channel = prop.channel; >> + iio_chan->datasheet_name = vadc_chan->datasheet_name; >> + iio_chan->info_mask_separate = vadc_chan->info_mask; >> + iio_chan->type = vadc_chan->type; >> + iio_chan->indexed = 1; >> + iio_chan->scan_type.sign = 's'; >> + iio_chan->scan_type.realbits = 15; >> + iio_chan->scan_type.storagebits = 16; >> + iio_chan->address = index++; >> + >> + iio_chan++; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> + >> +static int vadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev; >> + struct vadc_priv *vadc; >> + struct resource *res; >> + struct regmap *regmap; >> + int ret, irq_eoc; >> + >> + regmap = dev_get_regmap(dev->parent, NULL); >> + if (!regmap) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_REG, 0); >> + if (!res) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*vadc)); >> + if (!indio_dev) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + vadc = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> + vadc->regmap = regmap; >> + vadc->dev = dev; >> + vadc->base = res->start; >> + vadc->are_ref_measured = false; >> + init_completion(&vadc->complete); >> + >> + ret = vadc_check_revision(vadc); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + vadc->nchannels = of_get_available_child_count(node); >> + if (!vadc->nchannels) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + vadc->iio_chans = devm_kcalloc(dev, vadc->nchannels, >> + sizeof(*vadc->iio_chans), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!vadc->iio_chans) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + vadc->chan_props = devm_kcalloc(dev, vadc->nchannels, >> + sizeof(*vadc->chan_props), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!vadc->chan_props) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + ret = vadc_get_dt_data(vadc, node); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + irq_eoc = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); >> + if (irq_eoc < 0) { >> + if (irq_eoc == -EPROBE_DEFER || irq_eoc == -EINVAL) >> + return irq_eoc; >> + vadc->poll_eoc = true; >> + } >> + > Isn't the part below actually the else section of the part above (and device_init_wakeup() belonging up there)? you are right, might be I wanted to avoid indentation issues. Will see how to make it better. >> + if (!vadc->poll_eoc) { >> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq_eoc, vadc_isr, >> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "spmi-vadc", vadc); >> + if (!ret) >> + enable_irq_wake(irq_eoc); >> + else >> + return ret; > Usually this is done this way: yes, I know just oversight it. > if (ret) > return ret; > > enable_irq_wake(irq_eoc); >> + } else { >> + device_init_wakeup(vadc->dev, true); >> + } >> + >> + ret = vadc_reset(vadc); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "reset failed\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, vadc); > Why bother to call platform_set_drvdata()? Seems leftover, will delete. -- regards, Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/