Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 08:48:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 08:48:08 -0500 Received: from cibs9.sns.it ([192.167.206.29]:17157 "EHLO cibs9.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 08:48:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:55:14 +0100 (CET) From: venom@sns.it To: John Bradford cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , , , , Subject: Re: BUG in 2.5.50 In-Reply-To: <200212091346.gB9DkcgN000690@darkstar.example.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1068 Lines: 27 On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, John Bradford wrote: > > please try without it. > > Is IDE TCQ liable to corrupt data on read-only volumes or just > read-write? The problem with nobody using it, is that it never gets > tested - if there are no known issues with read-only use it would be > nice to know. Well, to say the truth, when I tested it with 2.4.49, my IBM disk was running mutch slower than without TCQ, so I rebuilt a kernel without it just after one hour of tests. I think it will be difficoult that people will use it longer that 5 minutes if they don't see some performance gain (except people using it because they have some serious interess to develop IDE TCQ code). On the other side, also if there are stability problems, a lot of people will test it if they think they can gain a better performance. bests Luigi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/