Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 08:27:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 08:27:08 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swan.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:63163 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 08:27:07 -0500 Subject: Re: /proc/pci deprecation? From: Alan Cox To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Richard Henderson , Patrick Mochel , Willy Tarreau , Petr Vandrovec , Linux Kernel Mailing List , jgarzik@pobox.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 09 Dec 2002 14:11:07 +0000 Message-Id: <1039443067.10475.19.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 799 Lines: 18 On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 01:54, Linus Torvalds wrote: > - we should _never_ update the PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE register, because it > destroys boot loader information (the same way we need to not overwrite > BIOS extended areas and ACPI areas etc in order to be able to reboot > cleanly) I wonder if this is why we have all these problems with VIA chipset interrupt handling. According to VIA docs they _do_ use PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE on integrated devices to select the IRQ routing between APIC and PCI/ISA etc, as well as 0 meaning "IRQ disabled" Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/