Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752280AbaJOMTd (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:19:33 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:44965 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752172AbaJOMTb (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:19:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:19:29 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Linus Walleij , Samuel Ortiz , Lee Jones , Sebastian Reichel , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , David Woodhouse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Anton Vorontsov , Guenter Roeck , Myungjoo Ham , Jonghwa Lee , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] power_supply: sysfs: Use power_supply_*() API for accessing function attrs Message-ID: <20141015121929.GB26579@amd> References: <1413289246-31650-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1413289246-31650-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20141015103217.GB14266@amd> <1413370199.26771.4.camel@AMDC1943> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1413370199.26771.4.camel@AMDC1943> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static ssize_t power_supply_show_property(struct device *dev, > > > if (off == POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TYPE) { > > > value.intval = psy->type; > > > } else { > > > - ret = psy->get_property(psy, off, &value); > > > + ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, off, &value); > > > > > > > One thing.. Your power_supply_get_property (and friends) check for psy > > == NULL. Is it neccessary / good idea? As far as I can tell, it should > > not really be NULL... > > It is not necessary. I thought it would be a good behavior of such > exported function. You're right that this shouldn't be NULL especially > because previously it was dereferenced. > > Other existing power supply exported functions don't check this so maybe > I shouldn't introduce inconsistency. > > I'll remove the check and re-spin. I'll found ugly typos in commit > message anyway. Thanks! Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/