Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751661AbaJOQUy (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:20:54 -0400 Received: from 251.110.2.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.2.110.251]:59857 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751604AbaJOQUw (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:20:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:20:30 +0100 From: One Thousand Gnomes To: Dave Jones Cc: Felipe Balbi , Linux Kernel , x86@kernel.org, aubrey.li@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: x86: Make Atom PMC driver configurable. Message-ID: <20141015172030.6bb3c522@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20141015145924.GA21199@redhat.com> References: <20141015144603.GA19944@redhat.com> <20141015145245.GB11511@saruman> <20141015145924.GA21199@redhat.com> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:59:24 -0400 Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:52:45AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:46:03AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > The Atom PMC driver is always built-in, regardless of whether > > > the kernel being built is going to be run on an Atom (or even Intel) CPU. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > index f2327e88e07c..04280177c1e2 100644 > > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > @@ -2485,7 +2485,7 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP > > > depends on STA2X11 > > > > > > config PMC_ATOM > > > - def_bool y > > > + tristate "Intel Atom SOC power management controller driver" > > > > looks like you should still have this as default y just to make sure you > > a simple defconfig still enables this as it did before. > > I could, but why should this be default y ? There's no real > justification to inflict this on everyone, given atom is at best > a niche area of x86. Possibly because you work for an enterprise vendor. Atom is not remotely niche to everyone else. This really does want to be a default Y for X86 at least, although I can see that for the enterprise market you probably don't care quite so much right now. Without that you are going to break a lot of users configurations in a deeply surprising way. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/