Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751340AbaJPHz2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:55:28 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:61230 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750765AbaJPHz1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:55:27 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,730,1406617200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="590004656" Message-ID: <1413446067.2412.51.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm/CmHost.c: Fix noisy compile warnings From: Jeff Kirsher To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Joe Perches , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:54:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20141016074827.GD23154@mwanda> References: <1413375999-10210-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <20141015123431.GA23154@mwanda> <20141015125934.GB23154@mwanda> <1413378213.2412.13.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> <1413389496.7484.3.camel@perches.com> <20141015195345.GQ26918@mwanda> <1413403429.7484.13.camel@perches.com> <20141016074827.GD23154@mwanda> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ItTEJn99PdJLlwtd5fsG" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-ItTEJn99PdJLlwtd5fsG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 10:48 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:03:49PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 22:53 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:11:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 06:03 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > > [] > > > > > I thought I remember Greg saying something about getting rid of t= his > > > > > driver anyway, but I could be wrong. If Greg decides to keep thi= s > > > > > driver around, then I think we should something like your suggest= ion > > > > > above. > > > >=20 > > > > Or maybe just make the Kconfig depend on X86_32 > > >=20 > > > What I like about your patches is that they are pure theoretical work > > > and I don't have to think about them like regular proper patches with= a > > > signed off by etc. All the fun, none of the responsibility. > >=20 > > I've sent a lot of signed-off patches. > > These are simple suggestions. > >=20 > > I think COMPILE_TEST isn't useful here. >=20 > I don't understand... COMPILE_TEST means runing a static checker on > the driver. Why would we not want to do QA? I think we can drop this patch altogether since I have submitted another patch to remove this driver from the kernel completely, since Matthias Beyer (and Greg KH in earlier discussions) suggested we do so. --=-ItTEJn99PdJLlwtd5fsG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJUP3mzAAoJEOVv75VaS+3O/iAP/3f7dt5wKveqaHQwXh+KyVVR R7mZ31+8el3RZh350qj0V4LQJ/QEKyO8QUynOmqsdJbJLrmOXy8ialF6w8MsnZCv nKIolKquuEMkWKDN8CBi9DRgRzI7iJ5OWy0e634UND0UjA80QtW8hcmNHUOdAuXw KagRYd53K4cI9vJhox/OU+PRUtmDcxUHgzDBCB0FCGnEFxXG3CVsuj9ukCAd2TZX ODvVjvygre3KDIO3YNEXQOSmcKLVfcQc8tsIs/XOC/7SGS1lhPzCdyN1od2GJFR/ Sz/IOIilAK7Ew5l8b0K4V6G40tFol4/HZN0vBEdiW6GPE76iYLKbe6Clwby6CJAg tfn2X83BEVCVtvvdhNoXHFoMvs+3+qMeCU6fFaBcMMGyqaEVtcb2r4h/AML37vhR r51ZiRdzPAbouY9TlkehbCuqf8f5ZUeXH2lDOA+ehbLf363Vli4brISMVfWhHbtb 6Q6E8bPVa+2A4DxTD0LgU3cMEjiereTGj/Uyw8b2f1YLFjfJb/2hxZ2yAUY/c0ny XhmxiQ9bNFMI8q/yOT8HiAj+IIaXwHDfs/T3roZ5XCCN3PHRmoP84kltNGK3jZBM uePZDB7VSH4TdY34Vdx8Li32ovC+JPPQafV85hjxadEJ0r4ddavoicgSJL0NGZ2N MEyGsrbS6dm7ADsxq/gj =bAoF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ItTEJn99PdJLlwtd5fsG-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/