Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753048AbaJQFXw (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2014 01:23:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13802 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750729AbaJQFXu (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2014 01:23:50 -0400 Message-ID: <5440A7DE.5030806@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:23:42 +0800 From: Jason Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell , mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 1/3] virtio: support for urgent descriptors References: <1413011806-3813-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <1413011806-3813-2-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <877g01c2ml.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <877g01c2ml.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/15/2014 01:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > Jason Wang writes: >> Below should be useful for some experiments Jason is doing. >> I thought I'd send it out for early review/feedback. >> >> event idx feature allows us to defer interrupts until >> a specific # of descriptors were used. >> Sometimes it might be useful to get an interrupt after >> a specific descriptor, regardless. >> This adds a descriptor flag for this, and an API >> to create an urgent output descriptor. >> This is still an RFC: >> we'll need a feature bit for drivers to detect this, >> but we've run out of feature bits for virtio 0.X. >> For experimentation purposes, drivers can assume >> this is set, or add a driver-specific feature bit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang > The new VRING_DESC_F_URGENT bit is theoretically nicer, but for > networking (which tends to take packets in order) couldn't we just set > the event counter to give us a tx interrupt at the packet we want? > > Cheers, > Rusty. Yes, we could. Recent RFC of enabling tx interrupt use this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/