Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:59:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:59:45 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swan.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:5054 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:59:44 -0500 Subject: Re: /proc/pci deprecation? From: Alan Cox To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Richard Henderson , Patrick Mochel , Willy Tarreau , Petr Vandrovec , Linux Kernel Mailing List , jgarzik@pobox.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 10 Dec 2002 00:43:50 +0000 Message-Id: <1039481030.12046.19.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 862 Lines: 19 On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 18:11, Linus Torvalds wrote: > That's definitely where it should be - the behaviour of the > PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE register is clearly chip-specific, so it should be in > the chip-specific drivers.. > > It's a kind of strange behaviour, though. What chip is this? It sounds > kind of convenient, but as far as I can tell it can only work for those > kinds of PCI devices that are on the same chip as the irq controller.. VIA bridges. In my case its a CLE266 (onchip video, 5.1 audio, ide, usb, firewire, ethernet, floppy, serial, irda. parallel...) [See why I don't want to hack each driver 8)] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/