Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751700AbaJSVYt (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:24:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:41908 "EHLO mail-wg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750993AbaJSVYq (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:24:46 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 23:24:43 +0200 From: Frans Klaver To: Alexander Holler Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Fix common bug in most nand drivers not showing a device in sysfs Message-ID: <20141019212443.GA9322@gmail.com> References: <1401142372-14148-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <543F678E.1030401@ahsoftware.de> <54413B9B.9030702@ahsoftware.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54413B9B.9030702@ahsoftware.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > I assume the result will be just 21 one-line-patches anyway, missing > the chance to avoid similiar silly patch series in the future by > creating a common function (which even reduces code size over all). That's to be expected, yes. A single patch may even be defensible. I share your concern that it's easier to get it wrong than it is to get it right, though. > So, if you like, just add my Signed-off-by too, there isn't really much > one could do wrong. ;) Sure. Frans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/