Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:15:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:15:48 -0500 Received: from 24-216-100-96.charter.com ([24.216.100.96]:37342 "EHLO wally.rdlg.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:15:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:23:30 -0500 From: "Robert L. Harris" To: Linux-Kernel Subject: RAID5 chunksize? Message-ID: <20021210152330.GP32203@rdlg.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Robert L. Harris" , Linux-Kernel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1218 Lines: 43 Ok, say I'm building a 4 disk raid5 array. Performance is going to be critical as this system is going to be very IO intensive. We had to go RAID5 though due to filesystem requirements. According to the manufacturer the disks have: 8Meg DataBuffer 10K RPM Rotational speed SCSI Ultra 160 (Drive is: http://www.fel.fujitsu.com/home/product.asp?L=en&PID=248&INFO=fsp) What is the ideal Chunksize? Also it's going to have a lot of pretty decent sized files (100Meg or so average) so I was going to make it an ext3 with -T largefile and -M 1. Any other thoughts on how to lay down the disks/filesystem on this bugger? Robert :wq! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: FC96D405 DISCLAIMER: These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. FYI: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/