Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:53:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:53:27 -0500 Received: from ns1.alcove-solutions.com ([212.155.209.139]:6866 "EHLO smtp-out.fr.alcove.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:53:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:01:11 +0100 From: Stelian Pop To: James Morris Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.2 networking, NET_BH latency Message-ID: <20021210160111.GD23479@laguna.alcove-fr> Reply-To: Stelian Pop Mail-Followup-To: Stelian Pop , James Morris , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20021210155632.GC23479@laguna.alcove-fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1031 Lines: 33 On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:57:32AM +1100, James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Stelian Pop wrote: > > > > Can you reproduce the problem with a vanilla 2.2.23 kernel? > > > > I didn't try yet, but it is on my list. > > > > Should I interpret your message as some changes between 2.2.18 and 2.2.23 > > could be responsible for that behaviour or you are just shooting in the > > dark ? :-) > > > > No. I take it as 'no, this was not a shot in the dark' then... Could you please explain a bit more the problem ? Maybe point me to some networking changes in particular ? (in my particular case, it may be simpler to just try a specific patch instead of going directly to 2.2.23...). Thanks, Stelian. -- Stelian Pop Alcove - http://www.alcove.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/