Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754097AbaJUAyQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:54:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28225 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753038AbaJUAyO (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:54:14 -0400 Message-ID: <5445AEAB.6080200@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:54:03 -0400 From: Prarit Bhargava User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131028 Thunderbird/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Rusty Russell , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Masami Hiramatsu , Vivek Goyal , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel, add bug_on_warn References: <1413806420-31828-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <20141020152448.c50fa1855d451f4bba0f6f92@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20141020152448.c50fa1855d451f4bba0f6f92@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/20/2014 06:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:00:20 -0400 Prarit Bhargava wrote: > >> There have been several times where I have had to rebuild a kernel to >> cause a panic when hitting a WARN() in the code in order to get a crash >> dump from a system. Sometimes this is easy to do, other times (such as >> in the case of a remote admin) it is not trivial to send new images to the >> user. >> >> A much easier method would be a switch to change the WARN() over to a >> BUG(). This makes debugging easier in that I can now test the actual >> image the WARN() was seen on and I do not have to engage in remote >> debugging. >> >> This patch adds a bug_on_warn kernel parameter, which calls BUG() in the >> warn_slowpath_common() path. The function will still print out the >> location of the warning. >> >> Successfully tested by me. > > Looks nice and simple and useful. However I suspect you're exclusively > focussed on "I want a crash dump" and things haven't been fully thought > through. > > - Do you have any example WARN->BUG console output at hand? I'd like > to check for missing or duplicated info. Yep, here you go, with some additional annotation notes from me. The first line below is from the WARN_ON() to output the WARN_ON()'s location. After that, we hit the new BUG() call. WARNING: CPU: 27 PID: 3204 at /home/rhel7/redhat/debug/dummy-module/dummy-module.c:25 init_dummy+0x28/0x30 [dummy_module]() bug_on_warn set, calling BUG()... ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at kernel/panic.c:434! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: dummy_module(OE+) sg nfsv3 rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs fscache cfg80211 rfkill x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel igb iTCO_wdt aesni_intel iTCO_vendor_support lrw gf128mul sb_edac ptp edac_core glue_helper lpc_ich ioatdma pcspkr ablk_helper pps_core i2c_i801 mfd_core cryptd dca shpchp ipmi_si wmi ipmi_msghandler acpi_cpufreq nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc xfs libcrc32c sr_mod cdrom sd_mod mgag200 syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper isci ttm drm libsas ahci libahci scsi_transport_sas libata i2c_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod CPU: 27 PID: 3204 Comm: insmod Tainted: G OE 3.17.0+ #19 Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600CP/S2600CP, BIOS RMLSDP.86I.00.29.D696.1311111329 11/11/2013 task: ffff880034e75160 ti: ffff8807fc5ac000 task.ti: ffff8807fc5ac000 RIP: 0010:[] [] warn_slowpath_common+0xc1/0xd0 RSP: 0018:ffff8807fc5afc68 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000021 RBX: ffff8807fc5afcb0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88081efee5f8 RDI: ffff88081efee5f8 RBP: ffff8807fc5afc98 R08: 0000000000000096 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000711 R11: ffff8807fc5af93e R12: ffffffffa0424070 R13: 0000000000000019 R14: ffffffffa0423068 R15: 0000000000000009 FS: 00007f2d4b034740(0000) GS:ffff88081efe0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2d4a99f3c0 CR3: 00000007fd88b000 CR4: 00000000001407e0 Stack: ffff8807fc5afcb8 ffffffff8199f020 ffff88080e396160 0000000000000000 ffffffffa0423040 ffffffffa0425000 ffff8807fc5afd08 ffffffff81076be5 0000000000000008 ffffffffa0424053 ffff880700000018 ffff8807fc5afd18 Call Trace: [] ? dummy_greetings+0x40/0x40 [dummy_module] [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x55/0x70 [] init_dummy+0x28/0x30 [dummy_module] [] do_one_initcall+0xd4/0x210 [] ? __vunmap+0xc2/0x110 [] load_module+0x16a9/0x1b30 [] ? store_uevent+0x70/0x70 [] ? copy_module_from_fd.isra.44+0x129/0x180 [] SyS_finit_module+0xa6/0xd0 [] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17 Code: c4 08 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 48 c7 c7 20 42 8a 81 31 c0 e8 fc 80 5e 00 eb 80 48 c7 c7 78 42 8a 81 31 c0 e8 ec 80 5e 00 <0f> 0b 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 RIP [] warn_slowpath_common+0xc1/0xd0 RSP ---[ end trace 428218934a12088b ]--- > > - Did you consider permitting this to be tweaked at runtime via > /proc? Sometimes we get pesky WARNs at boot time and having runtime > alteration would permit the user to prevent those from tripping a > BUG. > I did actually, but I was wondering how people liked the idea before I looked at the /proc implementation. It's pretty much the same as panic_on_oops, so it's not difficult to do. > - Also, perhaps bug_on_warn should be single-shot: clear itself after > it has triggered one BUG. Because once the kernel has gone > WARN->BUG, it's probably messed up and is likely to trigger more > WARNs. Also, the kernel might generate many WARNs for the same > issue. Okay, I'll add that. > >> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt >> @@ -553,6 +553,8 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted. >> bttv.pll= See Documentation/video4linux/bttv/Insmod-options >> bttv.tuner= >> >> + bug_on_warn BUG() instead of WARN() > > There's no mention here that this feature is mainly aimed at generating > a crash dump. How do we tell the people who aren't reading this email > thread (ie: all of humanity except you and me ;)) that this feature > even exists? Is there crash dump documentation that we can update? > I'll look into this too. P. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/