Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129662AbQJaTcZ>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:32:25 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S130370AbQJaTcP>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:32:15 -0500
Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:49166 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S129662AbQJaTcF>;
	Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:32:05 -0500
From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Message-Id: <200010311931.WAA22837@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: for small packets TCP_NODELAY still delays
To: antony@mira.NET (Antony Suter)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:31:37 +0300 (MSK)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <39FEED28.6D9A1C3A@mira.net> from "Antony Suter" at Oct 31, 0 07:15:10 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello!

> Does kernel 2.4.0-testX(latest) still have this behavior?

Why not to test and to report yet? 8)

It is not supposed to have this behaviour.

Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/