Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752345AbaJUFTj (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:19:39 -0400 Received: from lvnode1.ve.v10networks.ca ([209.141.36.111]:50226 "EHLO lvnode1.ve.v10networks.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750750AbaJUFTi (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:19:38 -0400 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: Add Hyper-V logical block provisioning quirks MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:19:31 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20141021044550.GC11691@sucs.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: Add Hyper-V logical block provisioning quirks Thread-Index: Ac/s6ewfh3Mv8Hf4TO2AcvD55p4YbwABJhAg References: <20141010074901.GA32028@sucs.org> <20141011173902.GA1946@infradead.org> <1413049313.2068.48.camel@jarvis.lan> <20141021044550.GC11691@sucs.org> From: "Jeff Leung" To: "Sitsofe Wheeler" , "KY Srinivasan" Cc: "James Bottomley" , "Christoph Hellwig" , "Haiyang Zhang" , "Christoph Hellwig" , "Hannes Reinecke" , , , Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by nfs id s9L5K0DQ029234 > Is it OK to replace a scsi_level of SCSI-2 with SCSI_SPC_3? Additionally is it also OK to force > SCSI_SPC_3 on Hyper-V 2008? I would patch the driver accordingly to force the SPC-3 flag. For a Win2k8 host, I don't know what the side effects are, so it's safe to say it's not a good idea to Force SCSI_SPC_3 ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?