Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754430AbaJUHob (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 03:44:31 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:61991 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753616AbaJUHoa (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 03:44:30 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Jassi Brar Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Ashwin Chaugule , "ks.giri@samsung.com" , Matt Porter , LeyFoon Tan , "Anna, Suman" , Bjorn Andersson , Mark Brown , Kevin Hilman , Andy Green , Grant Likely , Andrew Bresticker , Sudeep Holla , "Ira W. Snyder" , Alexandre Torgue , lkml Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] New Mailbox framework for 3.18 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:43:57 +0200 Message-ID: <3078007.YbCSC1R6J1@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:9zhuZzn0xKgCOI2SRslOOAK6Rxry4nbO0oYQDAsvvBI oODG8mNdPyrQ3MNdR2Gw4mraqwizRQVN2cdMfNtTekT2XLDgpp u/MQ4ZX6lJJvJsd4m7gsZVfewfemfdvpUYyywfkXiPDz0KWO7j ZzWwZ3NR2/fXsZySayNKkfQ3J7oLaTsJ847aJzpaVGqGJl3/4d P7VcxzKfUavuEmQ60zY8jVIoi7PxuwK1yS0+QL5Wd23rtRlB4C mzIJ9sxBbZtINd7UovtH6SXqaSa1mn6rnTq95jtxTL1jcWglKO qRWRXmw/vTumhi+MYFGEsZAtyzejrWnxEvUsnKcV9OJV6ToLu1 LzUbvObdsSzJUQ2bPIh0= X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 20 October 2014 15:23:38 Jassi Brar wrote: > On 8 October 2014 11:09, Jassi Brar wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > > > A framework for Mailbox controllers and clients have been cooking for > > more than a year now. Everybody in the CC list had been copied on > > patchset revisions and most of them have made sounds of approval, > > though just one concrete Reviewed-by. The patchset has also been in > > linux-next for a couple of weeks now and no conflict has been > > reported. The framework has the backing of at least 5 platforms, > > though I can't say if/when they upstream their drivers (some > > businesses have 'changed'). > > > Hi Linus, > While I was speculating on the reasons why you were not merging the > patchset - not enough Acked-Bys, you want it via asoc, my git server > down (I am not aware) or you just forgot in the unlikely case - I > missed the window. > There are couple of platforms waiting for the api to get upstream and > now I have the devs on my back. Assuming I messed up the pull request > somehow, may I know how? Jassi, I assume a contributing factor here was that you rebased the tree just before submission, which is always a bad sign. There is a small chance that Linus will still pull this for v3.18, as he said that he'd take a few things that have been submitted in time. If not, please rebase once more on top of v3.18-rc1 and send a pull request to arm@kernel.org so we can put it into arm-soc for 3.19. Linus, I think it would be good to have it, I had an earlier version in arm-soc a couple of merge windows ago but ended up not submitting it back then because of a last-minute problem. All issues have been resolved since, and we have a number of platforms that want to add drivers on top of the framework. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/