Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932914AbaJUT2R (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:28:17 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:50582 "EHLO mail-pa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932569AbaJUT2Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:28:16 -0400 Message-ID: <5446B3CC.1080904@amacapital.net> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:28:12 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bastien Nocera , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: A desktop environment[1] kernel wishlist References: <1413881397.30379.7.camel@hadess.net> In-Reply-To: <1413881397.30379.7.camel@hadess.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/21/2014 01:49 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Hey, > > GNOME has had discussions with kernel developers in the past, and, > fortunately, in some cases we were able to make headway. > > There are however a number of items that we still don't have solutions > for, items that kernel developers might not realise we'd like to rely > on, or don't know that we'd make use of if merged. > > I've posted this list at: > https://wiki.gnome.org/BastienNocera/KernelWishlist > > Let me know on-list or off-list if you have any comments about those, so > I can update the list. I don't know much about desktop environment infrastructure, but I think the kernel probably already has a lot of what's needed for LinuxApps. Tools like Sandstorm [1] (shameless plug, but it's a good example here) can already sandbox normal-ish programs, and those sandboxes can be launched without privilege [2]. Why is kdbus needed? Why are overlays better than, say, btrfs lightweight copies here? Also, overlayfs might actually make it for 3.19. [1] sandstorm.io [2] https://github.com/sandstorm-io/sandstorm/blob/master/src/sandstorm/supervisor-main.c%2B%2B As for childfs, I implemented procfs polling a couple years ago, but it never went anywhere: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1840e47fc4113af16989a4250d98bed62a9bce53.1354559528.git.luto@amacapital.net If that would help, I can try to dust it off and get it in to the kernel. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/