Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753469AbaJVBYN (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:24:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55076 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750769AbaJVBYM (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:24:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:24:05 -0400 From: Richard Guy Briggs To: Paul Moore Cc: Steve Grubb , Eric Paris , linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket Message-ID: <20141022012405.GP15532@madcap2.tricolour.ca> References: <30ef5c1ba42b52953e5684a0322975c3f0fadc77.1412706089.git.rgb@redhat.com> <1412708594.3333.94.camel@localhost> <2131923.Byl8GhZuQt@x2> <1645943.LlOpH1gJUB@sifl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1645943.LlOpH1gJUB@sifl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/10/21, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 03:56:10 PM Steve Grubb wrote: > > audit_log_task_info logs too much information for typical use. There are > > times when you might want to know everything about what's connecting. But > > in this case, we don't need anything about groups, saved uids, fsuid, or > > ppid. > > > > Its a shame we don't have a audit_log_task_info_light function which only > > records: > > > > pid= auid= uid= subj= comm= exe= ses= tty= > > This is getting back to my earlier concerns/questions about field ordering, or > at the very least I'm going to hijack this conversation and steer it towards > field ordering ;) Well, I've already been pushing it that way because it interferes with any sort of refactoring that needs to be done to simplify and clean up the kernel log code. > Before we go to much farther, I'd really like us to agree that ordering is not > important, can we do that? As a follow up, what do we need to do to make that > happen in the userspace tools? At the very least, as I've suggested, agree on at least one more order, a canonical one, that can provide a much more firm guide how to present the keywords so that we're not stuck with an arbitrary order that turns out not to make sense for some reason or another. > paul moore - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/