Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932367AbaJVHfP (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:35:15 -0400 Received: from homie.mail.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.208]:54547 "EHLO homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754216AbaJVHfI (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:35:08 -0400 Message-ID: <1413963289.26628.3.camel@linux-t7sj.site> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Another go at speculative page faults From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, riel@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de, oleg@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:34:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20141020215633.717315139@infradead.org> References: <20141020215633.717315139@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 23:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hi, > > I figured I'd give my 2010 speculative fault series another spin: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/4/257 > > Since then I think many of the outstanding issues have changed sufficiently to > warrant another go. In particular Al Viro's delayed fput seems to have made it > entirely 'normal' to delay fput(). Lai Jiangshan's SRCU rewrite provided us > with call_srcu() and my preemptible mmu_gather removed the TLB flushes from > under the PTL. > > The code needs way more attention but builds a kernel and runs the > micro-benchmark so I figured I'd post it before sinking more time into it. > > I realize the micro-bench is about as good as it gets for this series and not > very realistic otherwise, but I think it does show the potential benefit the > approach has. > > (patches go against .18-rc1+) I think patch 2/6 is borken: error: patch failed: mm/memory.c:2025 error: mm/memory.c: patch does not apply and related, as you mention, I would very much welcome having the introduction of 'struct faut_env' as a separate cleanup patch. May I suggest renaming it to fault_cxt? Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/