Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752149AbaJVNVG (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:21:06 -0400 Received: from 251.110.2.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.2.110.251]:37583 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752100AbaJVNVE (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:21:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:20:16 +0100 From: One Thousand Gnomes To: Nick Dyer Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Jonathan Cameron , Greg KH , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Touch processing on host CPU Message-ID: <20141022142016.42e8032c@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <54468E0D.2010200@itdev.co.uk> References: <5440F282.8040306@itdev.co.uk> <20141017171756.GA22238@dtor-ws> <20141021132229.37a1197c@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> <54468E0D.2010200@itdev.co.uk> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > This sounds promising. The only sticking point I can see is that a touch > frontend has many more channels (possibly thousands), which would seem to > impose a lot of overhead when put into the IIO framework. I will certainly > take a closer look at it. If that is the case then it may not be the right match - but it might also be a good argument for fixing the IIO layer so it isn't ? Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/