Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752256AbaJVOkr (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:40:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:42756 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751022AbaJVOkq (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:40:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20141022141857.GA8639@kroah.com> References: <1413035383-3981-1-git-send-email-pmunksgaard@gmail.com> <20141011142049.GA11456@kroah.com> <20141022095112.GJ2113@localhost> <20141022141857.GA8639@kroah.com> From: Philip Munksgaard Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:40:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: serial: Fix indentation style issue To: Greg KH Cc: Johan Hovold , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22 October 2014 16:18, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:51:12AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 07:20:49AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 03:49:43PM +0200, Philip Munksgaard wrote: >> > > Fix a style issue >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Philip Munksgaard >> > > --- >> > > drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 2 +- >> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > > >> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c >> > > index d1a3f60..d88998d 100644 >> > > --- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c >> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c >> > > @@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option_ids[] = { >> > > { USB_DEVICE(TLAYTECH_VENDOR_ID, TLAYTECH_PRODUCT_TEU800) }, >> > > { USB_DEVICE(LONGCHEER_VENDOR_ID, FOUR_G_SYSTEMS_PRODUCT_W14), >> > > .driver_info = (kernel_ulong_t)&four_g_w14_blacklist >> > > - }, >> > > + }, >> > >> > Why not fix the same 'space' issue on the line before this at the same >> > time? >> >> And what about the remaining white-space issues in this file? Do we >> really want to go down this path? > > No, we don't, if you want to have patches be able to apply properly to > older kernels, as you point out. > > Just don't add new whitespace issues please, that's all. > I'm a bit confused. I've already submitted a new patch that merges the two lines and fixes the whitespace issues on both (if you can't find it, let me know and I'll resend it), is there anything else I'm supposed to do? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/