Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752576AbaJVPHa (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:07:30 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:45791 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751889AbaJVPH2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:07:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:07:15 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Richter , Frederic Weisbecker , Mike Galbraith , Paul Mackerras , Stephane Eranian , Andi Kleen , kan.liang@intel.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, acme@infradead.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/20] perf: Add AUX record Message-ID: <20141022150715.GF21513@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1413207948-28202-1-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> <1413207948-28202-7-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> <20141022132608.GM12706@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <87fvegdw7e.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fvegdw7e.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 05:18:29PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Peter Zijlstra writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:45:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > >> + /* > >> + * Records that new data landed in the AUX buffer part. > >> + * > >> + * struct { > >> + * struct perf_event_header header; > >> + * > >> + * u64 aux_offset; > >> + * u64 aux_size; > >> + * u64 flags; > >> + * struct sample_id sample_id; > >> + * }; > >> + */ > >> + PERF_RECORD_AUX = 11, > > > > Given the discussion with the ARM people the last time, do we want to > > add the possibility of a variable data field in this event? Its easy to > > add now, harder to do later (although not impossible). > > Iirc, what they want is to save a once-per-session chunk of data, which > would be better synthesized by perf record than sent from a pmu driver? > > We do something like that with PT right now, perf record looks at pmu's > sysfs attributes and stores them in some synthesized record. Right, I just got to that. So I wasn't entirely sure if perf_event_open time conditions where sufficient for them, if they are then yes that could work. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/