Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:47:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:47:25 -0500 Received: from mail.webmaster.com ([216.152.64.131]:27570 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:47:25 -0500 From: David Schwartz To: , X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.63 (1077) - Licensed Version Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:55:07 -0800 In-Reply-To: <00d501c2a0ac$fe66bc40$0201a8c0@melanson> Subject: Re: Is this going to be true ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <20021211005509.AAA27981@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 769 Lines: 18 On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:33:58 -0500, Michael Melanson wrote: >Didn't they support an "Unix subsystem" on older versions of NT, to emulate >console Unix apps? I seem to remember something about a that a while ago. Many versions of Windows have an almost completely useless POSIX subsystem. It supplies everything POSIX demands and not a drop more, including essentially no way to interact with the other subsystems. I believe Microsoft implemented it simply to be able to put a checkbox next to 'POSIX compliant'. DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/