Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:23:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:23:28 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:4768 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:23:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:30:31 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Robert Love Cc: davidel@xmailserver.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: don't printk pointer value Message-ID: <20021211063031.GH9882@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Robert Love , davidel@xmailserver.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1039588045.833.3.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1039588045.833.3.camel@phantasy> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 758 Lines: 17 On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:27:25AM -0500, Robert Love wrote: > I really cannot think of a good reason why eventpoll_init() should print > a pointer value to user-space - especially the value of current? > I do not think this is good practice and someone might even consider it > a security hole. Personally, I would prefer to remove the "successfully > initialized" message altogether, but at the very least can we not print > current's address? You're still passing current as an argument to the printk. Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/