Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756694AbaJXNgR (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:36:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52115 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756398AbaJXNgQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:36:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:36:01 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Kan Liang Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, acme@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 17/17] perf tools: choose to dump callchain from LBR and FP Message-ID: <20141024133600.GC1036@krava.brq.redhat.com> References: <1413755712-8259-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <1413755712-8259-18-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1413755712-8259-18-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 05:55:12PM -0400, Kan Liang wrote: SNIP > - return 0; > - } > - continue; > + mix_chain_nr = i + 2 + lbr_nr; > + if (mix_chain_nr > PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) { > + pr_warning("corrupted callchain. skipping...\n"); > + return 0; > } > > - al.filtered = 0; > - thread__find_addr_location(thread, machine, cpumode, > - MAP__FUNCTION, ip, &al); > - if (al.sym != NULL) { > - if (sort__has_parent && !*parent && > - symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex)) > - *parent = al.sym; > - else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al && > - symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) { > - /* Treat this symbol as the root, > - forgetting its callees. */ > - *root_al = al; > - callchain_cursor_reset(&callchain_cursor); > + for (j = 0; j < mix_chain_nr; j++) { > + struct addr_location al; > + > + if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) { > + if (j < i + 2) > + ip = chain->ips[j]; > + else > + ip = lbr_stack->entries[j - i - 2].from; > + } else { > + if (j < lbr_nr) > + ip = lbr_stack->entries[lbr_nr - j - 1].from; > + else > + ip = chain->ips[i + 1 - (j - lbr_nr)]; > } > + err = __machine__resolve_callchain_sample(machine, > + thread, ip, &cpumode, parent, root_al, &al); > + /* Discard all when the callchain is corrupted */ > + if (err > 0) > + return 0; > + else if (err) > + return err; so you print FP callchains followed by LBR stack data, right? but AFAICS from kernel changes the FP callchains and LBR callchains data are unrelated.. 2 datasources of the same information do we rather want to print them separately? or using an option as Andi did in his lbr-as-callgraph patchset: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141177467802602&w=2 thanks, jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/