Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:46:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:46:01 -0500 Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.123]:1939 "EHLO swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:45:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 07:46:43 -0800 (PST) From: James Simmons X-X-Sender: To: Antonino Daplas cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Fbdev development list Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: atyfb in 2.5.51 In-Reply-To: <1039610834.1084.106.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 691 Lines: 16 > Before, most drivers just unconditionally refresh the hardware at every > switch during set_var(). I've been pointing this out for a long time > now, do we unconditionally do a check_var()/set_par() after every > console switch, or do we rely on fbdev and X cooperating with each > other? Or better, maybe fbcon has a way of knowing if the switch came > from Xfree86. My next project is to fix this issue. I will be working on that today. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/